Which statement about restrictive interventions is true?

• A. They should be aggressive to prevent harm
• B. They should be used as a last resort and be the least restrictive
• C. They should be the default first step
• D. They should ignore risk vs. rights

Answer: (B)

Restrictive interventions should be used only as a last resort and be the least restrictive option needed to keep everyone safe. This means teams start with de-escalation, supportive communication, and environmental or procedural adjustments. If a restriction becomes necessary, apply the minimum amount of restriction required to prevent harm, for the shortest duration possible, and with continuous monitoring and a plan to release as soon as safety is restored. This approach honors dignity and rights, reduces trauma, and is grounded in ongoing risk assessment.

Aggressive actions are unsafe and unethical, so they don’t fit. Using restraints as the default first step bypasses de-escalation opportunities and increases harm. Ignoring risk versus rights undermines safety and human rights, which these practices are designed to protect.